Wednesday, July 30, 2014
Monday, July 28, 2014
Friday, July 25, 2014
Tuesday, July 22, 2014
Monday, July 21, 2014
DOES THE SUPREME COURT FINALLY SEE FEMINIST MANDATES & LAWS FOR WHAT THEY REALLY ARE....
Propaganda, overkill, women's rights run amok. In recent years we have seen and heard of these unnecessary feminist mandates some without proof, like "equal pay act" . Women's healthcare act"
"violence against women act", now we all know that there's violence against women, but that can be said about everybody. So what makes women soo special that they need a mandate from the government? Are their lives more important than mine? If we were to go on facts, there's more men that are killed (on any given year) in America than women. I mean, shit! I don't even think there's a "violence against children act"!!!
The national media is now asking "is there a war on women & women's rights" the answer to that is NO! because every time you turn around it's women, women, women. Obama with his women rights mandates ( as if women were some kind of aliens from another world).
You have the Media & politicans constantly talking about women's rights and how there going to protect them.
What is happening is men are starting to demand more equality & treatment in social, domestic, judicial areas of our society, at the same time we are being ignored & getting push-back from these political agendas.
Contraceptives, the female health mandate. I don't agree with it, nobody should have to pay for somebody else's "sexual activities", but if it is made into a law why only for one gender?
I'm sure men wouldn't mind somebody else paying for our sexual activities. See how embolden and arrogant this mandate was, it makes no sense!
We also have to deal with a sitting President who violates his own mandates. I think it's safe to say that this President practices "male gender discrimination" which nobody has addressed and publicly has called him out on.
I think everyone would agree that sexual intercourse is a mutual consentrual act between a man and a woman, so when it comes to abortion why is women the only ones to decide, I know women don't take abortion lightly, but no matter what you believe you are not in this alone. Fathers should have the right to be fathers if they so wish, regardless of marital status. Fathers should have the right to protect their unborn children. Abortion should only be allowed in cases of rape & risk of death to mother.
We are NOT against women's rights, we want women to have equal rights, but when being equal is not convenient you want specical treatment which makes you unequal.
"violence against women act", now we all know that there's violence against women, but that can be said about everybody. So what makes women soo special that they need a mandate from the government? Are their lives more important than mine? If we were to go on facts, there's more men that are killed (on any given year) in America than women. I mean, shit! I don't even think there's a "violence against children act"!!!
The national media is now asking "is there a war on women & women's rights" the answer to that is NO! because every time you turn around it's women, women, women. Obama with his women rights mandates ( as if women were some kind of aliens from another world).
You have the Media & politicans constantly talking about women's rights and how there going to protect them.
What is happening is men are starting to demand more equality & treatment in social, domestic, judicial areas of our society, at the same time we are being ignored & getting push-back from these political agendas.
Contraceptives, the female health mandate. I don't agree with it, nobody should have to pay for somebody else's "sexual activities", but if it is made into a law why only for one gender?
I'm sure men wouldn't mind somebody else paying for our sexual activities. See how embolden and arrogant this mandate was, it makes no sense!
We also have to deal with a sitting President who violates his own mandates. I think it's safe to say that this President practices "male gender discrimination" which nobody has addressed and publicly has called him out on.
I think everyone would agree that sexual intercourse is a mutual consentrual act between a man and a woman, so when it comes to abortion why is women the only ones to decide, I know women don't take abortion lightly, but no matter what you believe you are not in this alone. Fathers should have the right to be fathers if they so wish, regardless of marital status. Fathers should have the right to protect their unborn children. Abortion should only be allowed in cases of rape & risk of death to mother.
We are NOT against women's rights, we want women to have equal rights, but when being equal is not convenient you want specical treatment which makes you unequal.
Wednesday, July 9, 2014
Tuesday, July 8, 2014
Sonya McCaul custody case back in Dickson County courtroom - WKRN News 2
Sonya McCaul custody case back in Dickson County courtroom - WKRN News 2
THE FOSTER FAMILY NEEDS TO BACK OFF! LET THIS FATHER & DAUGHTER LIVE IN PEACE WITH EACH OTHER.
THE FOSTER FAMILY IN THIS CASE HAS RIGOROUSLY TRIED TO STOP THIS FATHER FROM BEING WITH HIS OWN DAUGHTER AND FAILED EVERY TIME. HAD HE BEEN A WOMAN, I DON'T THINK HE WOULD HAVE BEEN PURSUED FOR THIS LONG. YOU HAVE NO REASON TO KEEP THIS MAN FROM HIS CHILD, LEAVE HIM ALONE!!!
THE JUDGE SHOULD HAVE GRANTED HIS DEFAMATION SUIT, I WOULDN'T PUT IT PASS THE FOSTER FAMILY, WHO PROBABLY DID MAKE FALSE ALLEGATIONS. THAT'S WHAT PEOPLE DO TO FATHERS WHEN THEIR DOWN "KEEP KICKING THEM".
I HOPE THIS JUDGE MAKES THE RIGHT DECISION: RULE IN FAVOR OF THE BIOLOGICAL
FATHER.
THE FOSTER FAMILY NEEDS TO BACK OFF! LET THIS FATHER & DAUGHTER LIVE IN PEACE WITH EACH OTHER.
THE FOSTER FAMILY IN THIS CASE HAS RIGOROUSLY TRIED TO STOP THIS FATHER FROM BEING WITH HIS OWN DAUGHTER AND FAILED EVERY TIME. HAD HE BEEN A WOMAN, I DON'T THINK HE WOULD HAVE BEEN PURSUED FOR THIS LONG. YOU HAVE NO REASON TO KEEP THIS MAN FROM HIS CHILD, LEAVE HIM ALONE!!!
THE JUDGE SHOULD HAVE GRANTED HIS DEFAMATION SUIT, I WOULDN'T PUT IT PASS THE FOSTER FAMILY, WHO PROBABLY DID MAKE FALSE ALLEGATIONS. THAT'S WHAT PEOPLE DO TO FATHERS WHEN THEIR DOWN "KEEP KICKING THEM".
I HOPE THIS JUDGE MAKES THE RIGHT DECISION: RULE IN FAVOR OF THE BIOLOGICAL
FATHER.
Wednesday, July 2, 2014
EQUAL PARENTAL RIGHTS FOR FATHERS: FEMALE CONTRACEPTIVE MANDATE, OBAMA'S "FEMINISM" O...
EQUAL PARENTAL RIGHTS FOR FATHERS: FEMALE CONTRACEPTIVE MANDATE, OBAMA'S "FEMINISM" O...: I'm happy to say that the Supreme Court has finally woke up and struck down this unusual & bias mandate. This never made any sense a...
FEMALE CONTRACEPTIVE MANDATE, OBAMA'S "FEMINISM" OVERKILL LAW & THE SUPREME COURT
I'm happy to say that the Supreme Court has finally woke up and struck down this unusual & bias mandate. This never made any sense and was wrong on many levels from jump!
For one, it discriminated against males (Obama only advocated for one gender). Two, it disregarded the rights of religion and very self-centered.
This was just another way for government & the Obama administration to relieve women of their responsibility.
Why should your job or anybody (for that matter) have to pay for your sexual habbits. it's insane, right!!
Feminist keep saying "my body my choice" well, if you beileve that then pay for it yourselves!
In a little way this ruling helps unborn children and expecting fathers to be. The U.S. Constitution says there is a seperation between religion and government, there isn't a constitutional law that says you have to pay for somebody elses sexual habbits.
If this mandate had passed, what would be next. we would have to pay for your Maxi-Pads & Tampoons too.
For one, it discriminated against males (Obama only advocated for one gender). Two, it disregarded the rights of religion and very self-centered.
This was just another way for government & the Obama administration to relieve women of their responsibility.
Why should your job or anybody (for that matter) have to pay for your sexual habbits. it's insane, right!!
Feminist keep saying "my body my choice" well, if you beileve that then pay for it yourselves!
In a little way this ruling helps unborn children and expecting fathers to be. The U.S. Constitution says there is a seperation between religion and government, there isn't a constitutional law that says you have to pay for somebody elses sexual habbits.
If this mandate had passed, what would be next. we would have to pay for your Maxi-Pads & Tampoons too.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)